Numeral Trademarks are Registrable

In this matter, the Appellant’s application for the mark ‘2929’ was rejected. In its order, the Registrar stated that the mark consists of a combination of common numerals, which cannot be monopolized by any individual. The order further stated that the Appellant had failed to establish that this combination which lacked creativity was entitled to […]
Read More

Determination of Infringement in Musical Works Must be Assessed From the Perspective of a ‘Lay Listener’(Delhi High Court, April 25, 2025)

In this case regarding infringement of musical composition, the Delhi High Court held that the two musical compositions are identical with only a mere change of lyrics.  The Plaintiff’s musical composition titled ‘Shiva Stuti’ was originally created by the Plaintiff’s father and uncle, also known as the ‘Junior Dagar Brothers’ in the 1970s. The Plaintiff […]
Read More

Cannot Claim Perpetual Copyright Over Mass-Produced Industrial Designs (Supreme Court of India, April 15, 2025)

Inox India Ltd. sued Cryogas Equipment Pvt. Ltd. and LNG Express India Pvt. Ltd. for alleged copyright infringement of their proprietary engineering drawings. These drawings were used in the design and manufacture of cryogenic storage tanks and LNG distribution systems. Inox claimed that its technical drawings were ‘artistic works’ under the Copyright Act, 1957, and […]
Read More

Draft Guidelines for Examination of Computer-Related Inventions (CRI) Released for Public Consultation (Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks, March 25, 2025)

The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks (CGPDTM) released the Draft CRI Guidelines, 2025 on March 25, 2025. The Draft aims to provide clarity on the assessment of computer-related inventions in India, taking into consideration the advancement of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, etc. The guidelines also address […]
Read More

Sale of Counterfeit Medical Products is a Public Health and Safety Risk, Not Only a Trademark Violation (Delhi High Court, March 11, 2025)

In this landmark case, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) sued Pritamdas Arora, trading as M/s Medserve, for large-scale counterfeiting of its registered medical device trademarks, including SURGICEL, ETHICON, and LIGACLIP. In 2019, counterfeit SURGICEL products were discovered in the United States of America and traced it back through a global supply chain to the entity named […]
Read More

Eighteen Year Long Delay in Deciding Patent Application Violates Principles of Natural Justice (Calcutta High Court, March 7, 2025)

Recently, the Intellectual Property Division of the Calcutta High Court set aside the rejection of Patent Application No. 4842/KOLNP/2007 titled “Crystalline Modifications to Pyraclostrobin”. The application was filed in 2007, but the Patent Office rejected the patent application in March 2024, with just over a year remaining in the patent’s 20-year term. The Court noted […]
Read More

Disclaimer

The website www.doddandco.com contains general information for the convenience of our clients and is not a source of advertising, solicitation of work, or legal advice.

By clicking the “Agree” button below, you accept that there has been no invitation, inducement, or personal communication by Dodd & Co. and its members to create an attorney-client relationship through this website.